Skip to main content

Comparison between IPv4 options and IPv6 extension headers & TRANSITION FROM IPv4 TO IPv6

Comparison between IPv4 options and IPv6 extension headers:



Comparison
              1. The header length field is eliminated in IPv6 because the length of the header is fixed in this version.
2.The service type field is eliminated in IPv6. The priority and flow label fields together take over the function of the service type field.
3.The total length field is eliminated in IPv6 and replaced by the payload length field.
4.The identification, flag, and offset fields are eliminated from the base header in IPv6. They are included in the fragmentation extension header.
5.The TTL field is called hop limit in IPv6.
6.The protocol field is replaced by the next header field.
7.The header checksum is eliminated because the checksum is provided by upper-layer protocols; it is therefore not needed at this level.
8.The option fields in IPv4 are implemented as extension headers in IPv6.



IPv6 ADDRESSES:


Despite all short-term solutions, address depletion is still a long-term problem for the Internet. This and other problems in the IP protocol itself have been the motivation for IPv6. An IPv6 address is 128 bits long.


TRANSITION FROM IPv4 TO IPv6:

Because of the huge number of systems on the Internet, the transition from IPv4 to IPv6 cannot happen suddenly. It takes a considerable amount of time before every system in the Internet can move from IPv4 to IPv6. The transition must be smooth to prevent any problems between IPv4 and IPv6 systems.

1.Dual Stack
2.Tunneling
3.Header Translation



Type prefixes for IPv6 addresses:



Type Prefix
Type
Fraction
0000 0000
Reserved
1/256
0000 0001
Unassigned
1/256
0000 001
ISO network addresses
1/128
0000 010
IPX (Novell) network addresses
1/128
0000 011
Unassigned
1/128
0000 1
Unassigned
1/32
0001
Reserved
1/16
001
Reserved
1/8
010
Provider-based unicast addresses
1/8


























Type prefixes for IPv6 addresses (continued):


Type Prefix

Type
Fraction
011


Unassigned
1/8
100


Geographic-based unicast addresses
1/8
101


Unassigned
1/8
110


Unassigned
1/8
1110


Unassigned
1/16
1111
0

Unassigned
1/32
1111
10

Unassigned
1/64
1111
110

Unassigned
1/128
1111
1110
0
Unassigned
1/512
1111
1110
10
Link local addresses
1/1024
1111
1110
11
Site local addresses
1/1024
1111
1111

Multicast addresses
1/256


Popular posts from this blog

Multiplexing and Multiple Access

Multiplexing And Multiple Access : Digital Communications Difference between Multiplexing and Multiple Access: Sr.No. Multiplexing Multiple Access 1 “In telecommunications and  computer networks, multiplexing is a process where multiple analog  message signals or digital data  streams are combined into one   signal over a shared medium.” “In telecommunications and computer networks, a channel access method or multiple access  method allows several terminals connected to the same multipoint physical medium to transmit over it and to share its capacity.” 2 The multiplexed signal is transmitted  over a communication channel,  which may be a physical transmission medium. A channel-access scheme is  based on a multiplex method  that allows several data streams  or signals to share the  same communication channel or  physical media.

Comparison between armature controlled and field controlled DC servo motor

Comparison between armature controlled and field controlled DC servo motor : Field controlled DC servomotor Armature controlled DC servomotor 1.                         Field is excited by control voltage Armature is excited by control voltage 2.                        Armature            current kept constant Field      current kept constant 3.                        Required             low        power amplifiers are simple to design Required             high       power amplifiers 4.                        Efficiency is poor Efficiency is better 5.                        It has large time constant It             has         small      time constant 6.                        Cost is low Cost is high 7.                        It is open loop system It is close loop system Comparison between ar

Difference in between Time division multiplexing (TDM) and Frequency division multiplexing (FDM)

Difference in between TDM and FDM: This page on FDM versus TDM describes  difference between FDM and TDM multiplexing . FDM is the short form of frequency division multiplexing and TDM is the short form of time division multiplexing. In FDM each signal is modulated onto different unique RF carrier frequency and all carrier frequencies are separated significantly so that bandwidth of the signals do not overlap in frequency domain. Figure: Difference in between TDM and FDM