Skip to main content

What is Dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) ?






















Dense wavelength division multiplexing  (DWDM) 



          "The emergence of DWDM is one of the most recent and important phenomena in the development of fiber optic transmission technology. In the following discussion we briefly trace the stages of fiber optic technology and the place of DWDM in that development. We then examine the functions and components of a DWDM system, including the enabling technologies, and conclude with a high-level description of the operation of a DWDM system".


Wdm with two channels
Wdm with two channels




Early WDM began in the late 1980s using the two widely spaced wavelengths in the 1310 nm and 1550 nm (or 850 nm and 1310 nm) regions, sometimes called wideband WDM. Figure 2-2 shows an

example of this simple form of WDM. Notice that one of the fiber pair is used to transmit and one is used to receive. This is the most efficient arrangement and the one most found in DWDM systems.


The early 1990s saw a second generation of WDM, sometimes called narrowband WDM, in which two to eight channels were used. These channels were now spaced at an interval of about 400 GHz in the

1550-nm window. By the mid-1990s, dense WDM (DWDM) systems were emerging with 16 to 40 channels and spacing from 100 to 200 GHz. By the late 1990s DWDM systems had evolved to the point where they were capable of 64 to 160 parallel channels, densely packed at 50 or even 25 GHz intervals.


The progression of the technology can be seen as an increase in the number of wavelengths accompanied by a decrease in the spacing of the wavelengths. Along with increased density of wavelengths, systems also advanced in their flexibility of configuration, through add-drop functions,

and management capabilities.of its lower attenuation, followed by a third window (C band) at 1550 nm with an even lower optical loss.

Today, a fourth window (L band) near 1625 nm is under development and early deployment. These four windows are shown relative to the electromagnetic spectrum below :


electromagnetic spectrum (EM spectrum)
Electromagnetic spectrum(EM spectrum)




Development of DWDM Technology :


       Early WDM began in the late 1980s using the two widely spaced wavelengths in the 1310 nm and 1550 nm (or 850 nm and 1310 nm) regions, sometimes called wideband WDM. Figure below shows an
example of this simple form of WDM. Notice that one of the fiber pair is used to transmit and one is used to receive. This is the most efficient arrangement and the one most found in DWDM systems.

 WDM with two channels
WDM with two channels


The early 1990s saw a second generation of WDM, sometimes called narrowband WDM, in which two to eight channels were used. These channels were now spaced at an interval of about 400 GHz in the
1550-nm window. By the mid-1990s, dense WDM (DWDM) systems were emerging with 16 to 40 channels and spacing from 100 to 200 GHz. By the late 1990s DWDM systems had evolved to the point where they were capable of 64 to 160 parallel channels, densely packed at 50 or even 25 GHz intervals.As Figure 2-3 shows, the progression of the technology can be seen as an increase in the number of wavelengths accompanied by a decrease in the spacing of the wavelengths. Along with increased density
of wavelengths, systems also advanced in their flexibility of configuration, through add-drop functions and management capabilities.


Evolution of  Dense wavelength division multiplexing DWDM:


Evolution of DWDM
Evolution of DWDM

        Increases in channel density resulting from DWDM technology have had a dramatic impact on the carrying capacity of fiber. In 1995, when the first 10 Gbps systems were demonstrated, the rate of increase in capacity went from a linear multiple of four every four years to four every year.




































 Growth in Fiber Capacity
Growth in Fiber Capacity







Watch a video on Dense wavelength division multiplexing  (DWDM) :





Basics of Multiplexing

Difference between Multiplexing and Multiple Access

Comparison in FDM and synchronus TDM and statistical TDM

How Multiplexing of signals in Fiber Optical cable is done?

Popular posts from this blog

Multiplexing and Multiple Access

Multiplexing And Multiple Access : Digital Communications Difference between Multiplexing and Multiple Access: Sr.No. Multiplexing Multiple Access 1 “In telecommunications and  computer networks, multiplexing is a process where multiple analog  message signals or digital data  streams are combined into one   signal over a shared medium.” “In telecommunications and computer networks, a channel access method or multiple access  method allows several terminals connected to the same multipoint physical medium to transmit over it and to share its capacity.” 2 The multiplexed signal is transmitted  over a communication channel,  which may be a physical transmission medium. A channel-access scheme is  based on a multiplex method  that allows several data streams  or signals to share the  same communication channel or  physical media.

Difference in between Time division multiplexing (TDM) and Frequency division multiplexing (FDM)

Difference in between TDM and FDM: This page on FDM versus TDM describes  difference between FDM and TDM multiplexing . FDM is the short form of frequency division multiplexing and TDM is the short form of time division multiplexing. In FDM each signal is modulated onto different unique RF carrier frequency and all carrier frequencies are separated significantly so that bandwidth of the signals do not overlap in frequency domain. Figure: Difference in between TDM and FDM

Comparison between armature controlled and field controlled DC servo motor

Comparison between armature controlled and field controlled DC servo motor : Field controlled DC servomotor Armature controlled DC servomotor 1.                         Field is excited by control voltage Armature is excited by control voltage 2.                        Armature            current kept constant Field      current kept constant 3.                        Required             low        power amplifiers are simple to design Required             high       power amplifiers 4.                        Efficiency is poor Efficiency is better 5.                        It has large time constant It             has         small      time constant 6.                        Cost is low Cost is high 7.                        It is open loop system It is close loop system Comparison between ar